>
 

Bookmark and Share

Food Safety Legislation Hits the Senate

Today, senators start debates over the Food Safety Modernization Act.

By Lisa Kivirist

November 17, 2010

Food Safety Legislation Hits the Senate

Courtesy Stock.XCHNG

The Food Safety Modernization Act was prompted by the nation's food recalls to basic staples, like spinach.

Just when you think politics and life on Capitol Hill might take a lame-duck session lull, the Food Safety Modernization Act (S.B. 510) adds some heated spice as the Senate begins debates on this bill today. The controversial legislation potentially affects all players in the agricultural system, so S.B. 510 warrants scrutiny and involvement, especially from small-scale growers from both rural and urban areas.
 
Let’s start with the core ingredients behind the Food Safety Modernization Act that everyone, in theory, agrees on: the fundamental right of all Americans to eat safe food and the need for improving checkpoints to achieve this. 

While the concept seems simple and fundamental, when you start formulating the “how” behind ensuring such rights, things overflow in complexity and controversy. Over the past century, we evolved from a nation of farmers to an industrialized food system intricate in layers and players. As Americans, we leaped from a country where the majority of us regularly ate what’s now known as the “100-mile diet” to one where we can’t pronounce names on a soup can’s ingredient list, much less know where they came from. 

The Act’s History

The current corporate agricultural system inherently increases risk in the food supply, and in many ways, the Food Safety Modernization Act is playing catch-up. It aims to regulate and control the nation’s food supply and the industrial-rooted problems created over the past 100 years.

Prompted by public outcry on recalls of basic kitchen staples like eggs, spinach and peanut butter, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) first introduced the bill in March 2009. The core legislation goal is to increase the power of the Food and Drug Administration to better monitor and prevent food-borne disease outbreaks, increasing the ability of the FDA to trace problems back to the source and holding those parties responsible.

While such general intents may sound reasonable, S.B. 510 has the potential to aversely affect small farms, including urban operations, because of a “one size fits all” legislative approach. By forcing growers of all sizes and locations to adhere to the same regulations, small operations won’t be able to afford the associated costs, paperwork and time commitment.

Act Amendments Support Small Operations

“While the Food Safety Modernization Act takes important steps to improve corporate food safety rules, it is not appropriate for small farms and processors that sell to places like restaurants, food co-ops, farm stands and farmers’ markets,” explains Annette Higby, grassroots coordinator for the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, an advocacy group representing more than 80 sustainable-agriculture groups across the country. “As we ramp up food-safety protections, it’s critical that we don’t inadvertently do harm by imposing expensive, ‘one size fits all’ rules.”

To address these concerns, small farm and sustainable-agriculture advocacy organizations like NSAC are championing two amendments that will be offered when S.B. 510 hits the Senate floor:

  • The Tester-Hagan Amendment creates size-appropriate requirements and less costly compliance alternatives.  For example, farms that direct-market more than 50 percent of their product to customers through on-farm or retail outlets, such as farmers’ markets, would not need to register with the FDA.

  • The Manager’s Amendment adds in multiple recommended changes that have arisen since the bill was first introduced to reduce paperwork and regulations for small farms and operations.

Urban farmers should look for updates and implications of the Food Safety Modernization Act as it comes to a vote in the next few weeks.

Give us your opinion on Food Safety Legislation Hits the Senate.
Submit Comment »
Government intervention and regulation rarely, very rarely, improves a situation. More often than not, it tries to impose a 'one size fits all' concept which actually turns out to be a 'one size fits the large corporate lobbyist interests.' There should be absolutely no legislation from Washington that should affect the local grower, the local producer, the local farmers' markets, etc. The oversight for those should also be local. If we value our long-standing rights as citizens of a free nation, we will require that Washington listen to reason and remove itself from the debate on purely local issues. The interstate issue is entirely different. Trans-national corporate issues are entirely different. Washington needs to focus on those exclusively. It has been said that growing your own food is the ultimate act of political defiance. Now it looks as though that may be more reality than theory.
Bruce, Las Vegas, NV
Posted: 11/23/2010 8:12:29 AM
That spinach looks pretty good. I'm not thrilled about government involvement though.
Galadriel, Lothlorien, ME
Posted: 11/22/2010 11:20:43 PM
I understand about the need for better quality food. I'm just not sure it should come from government regulation. Over the 60 some years of life I found that government regulation doesn't always work out the way its been planned. Just as it seems with this regulation. Actually I would feel safer with the food quality from a small local farmer then the large food grower. Lame duck legislative sessions are always a dangerous thing because they have nothing to lose.

Have a great local food day.
David, Omaha, NE
Posted: 11/22/2010 5:22:54 AM

Featured Product

Cooking with Heirlooms | More Info »

Related Articles

Advertiser Links

Top Products
d
Gold Standard

*Content generated by our loyal visitors, which includes comments and club postings, is free of constraints from our editors’ red pens, and therefore not governed by I-5 Publishing, LLC’s Gold Standard Quality Content, but instead allowed to follow the free form expression necessary for quick, inspired and spontaneous communication.

Would you like to receive Farmer in the City Newsletters?X Close Window
Please provide us with your email address in order to access this valuable sustainable-living content.
Fields marked with an asterisk * are required.
* Are you at least 13 years old?
YesNo
* First Name:
* Last Name:
* Email:
* City:
* State/Province:
* Enter the code shown:

  Yes, I would like to get valuable information from UrbanFarmOnline.com.
In order to opt-out of our newsletters, you can click on the "unsubscribe" link in the bottom of the newsletter.
  Yes, I would like to get valuable information from UrbanFarmOnline.com partners.